5 thoughts on “Do you think the restaurant should let pets enter?”
Connie
The question of "whether pet can enter the restaurant" has always been controversial. I personally support pets to enter the restaurant, but the premise is to move outside the dining area, and it cannot affect the guest's meals. The best one is the best. The method is to place pets with an exclusive area. Guests with pets need to prepare boxes and food themselves. If the restaurant does not have the conditions for temporarily storage of pets, it is better not to enter the restaurant. First of all, for those who like pets, after seeing pets, they are happier, but for those who do not like pets and are afraid of pets, seeing pets walking around themselves may be a meal. Can't eat anymore. Therefore, for families with pets, the family can settle the pets at home first when going out of dinner, or temporarily placed in a nearby pet shop. Without pets and will not affect their own dining. But for customers who don't like pets and are afraid of pets, there are pets where pets are. Well, don't enter the restaurant. Secondly, most pets are hairy. Most of the pet cats and pet dogs are "dandelion". For family -raising families, it is normal for people to eat pet hair. Things, but for people with allergies and rhinitis, the consequences of this small hair are very serious, and even if they like pets, no one wants to eat the hair of other pets. I do not support the reason why pets enter the restaurant. Finally, most pet dogs are more likely to call, especially when dogs see other dogs or animals, they often roar loudly. The restaurant is originally a place to enjoy food. Pets' rock parts, then customers choose not to accept.
Pets should not be allowed. Some people are particularly afraid of these pets, and they are where they eat. After taking them in, there will be a lot of bacteria and should not enter the restaurant.
The question of "whether pet can enter the restaurant" has always been controversial. I personally support pets to enter the restaurant, but the premise is to move outside the dining area, and it cannot affect the guest's meals. The best one is the best. The method is to place pets with an exclusive area. Guests with pets need to prepare boxes and food themselves. If the restaurant does not have the conditions for temporarily storage of pets, it is better not to enter the restaurant.
First of all, for those who like pets, after seeing pets, they are happier, but for those who do not like pets and are afraid of pets, seeing pets walking around themselves may be a meal. Can't eat anymore. Therefore, for families with pets, the family can settle the pets at home first when going out of dinner, or temporarily placed in a nearby pet shop. Without pets and will not affect their own dining.
But for customers who don't like pets and are afraid of pets, there are pets where pets are. Well, don't enter the restaurant.
Secondly, most pets are hairy. Most of the pet cats and pet dogs are "dandelion". For family -raising families, it is normal for people to eat pet hair. Things, but for people with allergies and rhinitis, the consequences of this small hair are very serious, and even if they like pets, no one wants to eat the hair of other pets. I do not support the reason why pets enter the restaurant.
Finally, most pet dogs are more likely to call, especially when dogs see other dogs or animals, they often roar loudly. The restaurant is originally a place to enjoy food. Pets' rock parts, then customers choose not to accept.
Pets should not be allowed. Some people are particularly afraid of these pets, and they are where they eat. After taking them in, there will be a lot of bacteria and should not enter the restaurant.
Pets should not be allowed, because this may affect everyone's health and even affect the food they eat.
The restaurant should not let pets enter, if pets enter, it will affect other customers.
The restaurant can allow pets to enter, but pets must be tied to rope, which is better for others.